Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96792

in Waianae, HawaiiPopulation 49,618

42.01/ 100

Ranked #25,200 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #90 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (bottom 2.2%)

Ranked #33 of 33 Urban Honolulu, HI ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

54.2%

in the top 0.02% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

15.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

30.1%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18 per million

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.8%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

41.2%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Waianae, Hawaii (ZIP 96792) ranks in the bottom 21% nationally (25,200th) and the bottom 2.2% of Hawaii (90th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled short sleep resides in the top 0.02% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the top 1.5% nationally. Crowded housing registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water sits at the national maximum. Modeled food insecurity rests in the top 6.0% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 8.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the top 8.8% nationally. On the encouraging side, lead in tap water settles at the national minimum, transit lies in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 6.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 96707, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

6%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

22%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

9%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

8%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.2 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $87,509 predicts 79.6 years — 4.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,259 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.2 ± 1.0 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.8 years — 6.6 years below them.

    Ranked #3,613 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.9–27.6
High blood pressure among adults34.8%31.8–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.3–6.2
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.3–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.6–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Depression among adults19.2%16.7–21.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%13.3–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.7–37.9
Obesity among adults37.0%31.7–42.2
Stroke among adults4.7%4.4–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%11.1–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%7.2–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.9%71.2–76.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.5%72.3–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults77.1%75.0–79.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.7%55.7–63.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.4%58.1–64.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.3%68.5–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.3%16.9–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%14.7–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%25.8–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults54.2%49.4–58.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.9%24.6–29.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%18.1–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%15.0–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%16.9–20.3
Any disability among adults37.5%34.1–40.7
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.4–12.5
Mobility disability among adults18.3%16.7–20.0
Self-care disability among adults5.6%5.2–6.1
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.6–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.3%30.1–36.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.1%27.7–32.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.8%22.2–27.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.1%18.2–22.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.6–14.2
Loneliness among adults35.3%31.9–38.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.4%10.1–12.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)9.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)10.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle11.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate64.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)15.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population9.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households42.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age35.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$87,509$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$569,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$1,759$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.2 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.0 yr (78.3–85.4) n=84

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 75.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured