Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96019

in Shasta Lake, CaliforniaPopulation 10,350

37.92/ 100

Ranked #28,053 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.6%)

Ranked #1,555 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 9.6%)

Ranked #26 of 26 Redding, CA ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

9.1%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

7.2%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Park land

22.9%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

65.1 days/year

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

39.7 per million

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

107.1 days/year

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

39.9%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Shasta Lake, California (ZIP 96019) ranks in the bottom 12.6% nationally (28,053rd) and the bottom 9.6% of California (1,555th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled energy burden stands in the top 0.6% nationally, and fine-particle sits in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides in the top 6.6% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 6.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. On the brighter side, park land resides in the top 6.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes sits in the bottom 14.4% nationally, modeled radon resides in the bottom 13.6% nationally, and elder services stands in the top 16% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 96001, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Redding, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.9 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $67,446 predicts 78.5 years — 2.6 years below.

    Ranked #3,574 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.9 ± 1.6 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.9 years — 3.0 years below them.

    Ranked #2,337 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.7 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 75.9 ± 1.6 years.

    Ranked #1,484 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.2–32.6
High blood pressure among adults37.8%33.8–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Depression among adults26.1%22.7–29.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%35.5–43.8
Obesity among adults31.9%25.5–38.8
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.1%11.4–17.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.4–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.0%69.9–76.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.2%69.4–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.7–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.8%55.3–65.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.3%53.3–61.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%63.5–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.1–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%14.9–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%21.1–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.9%33.2–46.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.7–28.5
Frequent mental distress among adults20.8%18.6–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%15.2–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.9–19.9
Any disability among adults36.9%32.6–41.2
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Mobility disability among adults18.4%16.2–20.7
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.3%22.5–30.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.2–20.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.4–22.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.1–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Loneliness among adults35.9%30.5–41.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6411.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)8.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)7.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate68.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households56.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age41.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$67,446$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$294,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,298$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.9 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 75.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured