Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95521

in Arcata, CaliforniaPopulation 21,980

49.66/ 100

Ranked #16,706 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #1,087 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

0.8 days/year

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.5 µg/L

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

25.5%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46.2%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

40.2%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.74 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.0%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Arcata, California (ZIP 95521), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 48% nationally (16,706th) and the bottom 37% of California (1,087th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled disaster risk settles in the top 1.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 4.8% nationally. Homeownership rests in the bottom 5.4% nationally. On the better side, modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and high cholesterol lands in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Lithium in drinking water rests in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure settles in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Civic rests in the top 7.1% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 95519, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.0 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $53,114 predicts 77.6 years — 1.4 years above.

    Ranked #1,310 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.0%16.9–21.3
High blood pressure among adults25.5%22.6–28.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Depression among adults28.2%24.5–32.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.0%25.9–32.4
Obesity among adults30.0%24.3–36.5
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%10.8–16.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.9–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure65.1%62.4–67.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.7%63.5–71.8
Cholesterol screening among adults78.5%76.1–80.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%56.0–66.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.0%55.1–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%65.3–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.7%16.5–23.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%11.0–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%18.1–24.7
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%28.6–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.2%18.0–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults22.2%20.1–24.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.6–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.8–20.7
Any disability among adults32.1%28.4–36.1
Hearing disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.3
Independent living disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.5%21.9–29.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.3%15.8–21.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.4%16.1–20.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.6–16.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.1–12.9
Loneliness among adults37.0%31.9–42.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)11.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle6.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription93.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate40.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households46.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age29.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$53,114$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$501,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,336$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured