ZIP code
95488
in Westport, CaliforniaPopulation 226
38.42/ 100
Ranked #27,770 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.4%)
Ranked #1,544 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 10.2%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Coronary heart disease
12.4%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
91.5%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.5%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
25.5%
in the top 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
7.2%
in the top 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
45.7%
in the top 3.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
30.9%
in the top 6.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.7%
in the top 5.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
48.5%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›The read
Westport, California (ZIP 95488), overall, ranks in the bottom 13.4% nationally (27,770th) and the bottom 10.2% of California (1,544th).
Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 1.3% nationally, stroke settles in the top 2.3% nationally, and mobility disability is in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled self-care disability sits in the top 5.1% nationally, high cholesterol lands in the top 3.2% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the top 5.6% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the top 5.2% nationally. On the better side, modeled tree cover registers in the top 0.9% nationally, and poverty resides at the national minimum.
ZIP 95417, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 2.9% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 89%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 44%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 4%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 15%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 28%
8%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 12%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 93%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 66%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 75%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 22%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 23%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 18%
8%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
95417
Californiashares a border
Score 39.25
Closest healthier
95437
Californiashares a border
Score 49.28
Similar health profile
97864
Oregon99% similar profile
Score 36.07
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 39.0% | 34.6–43.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 48.5% | 43.5–53.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.4% | 11.1–13.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.6% | 10.2–13.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 12.4% | 10.6–14.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.9% | 11.4–16.9 |
| Depression among adults | 24.7% | 20.9–28.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.7% | 15.9–21.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.7% | 40.6–50.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 32.2% | 24.7–39.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.5% | 5.6–7.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.7% | 15.0–22.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.3% | 6.4–10.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.8% | 76.4–82.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.9% | 74.1–81.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.8% | 86.8–90.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.5% | 60.8–71.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 57.8% | 53.6–61.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.7% | 61.3–78.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.4% | 10.0–14.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.6% | 15.9–23.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 30.5% | 24.8–36.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.2% | 29.6–42.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 30.9% | 25.9–36.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.3% | 16.0–20.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 20.7% | 17.8–24.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.4% | 14.8–20.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.5% | 36.6–48.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.7% | 10.1–13.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.6% | 10.5–15.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 25.5% | 21.3–30.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.2% | 6.0–8.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.2% | 6.9–9.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.4% | 21.4–30.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 20.0% | 16.0–24.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 23.0% | 18.5–28.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.7% | 11.4–16.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.2% | 8.6–12.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.2% | 28.0–39.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 7.3–10.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 61.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 2.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 30.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 96.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 41.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 96.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 68.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 27.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 63.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.8 yr ± 2.00 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.00 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured