Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95482

in Ukiah, CaliforniaPopulation 33,164

48.10/ 100

Ranked #18,800 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #1,191 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

393 units

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

41.4%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.4%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Ukiah, California (ZIP 95482) comes out in the bottom 41% nationally (18,800th) and the bottom 31% of California (1,191st).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: distance to a Superfund site registers at the national minimum, modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lands in the top 6.0% nationally. Housing-cost burden is in the top 8.6% nationally, modeled disaster risk resides in the top 8.9% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 9.8% nationally. Unemployment lies in the top 10.5% nationally. On the brighter side, distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 6.1% nationally, and dental providers registers in the top 10.6% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 95415, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%22.7–28.7
High blood pressure among adults34.7%30.7–38.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Depression among adults23.3%19.8–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.8–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.0–40.5
Obesity among adults29.3%22.5–36.2
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.0%10.4–15.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.9%10.4–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.9%68.6–74.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.6%67.4–75.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.3–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.1%55.5–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.7%55.6–63.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%64.8–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.6–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.6–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.1–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%29.4–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%22.2–27.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.8–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.4–19.0
Any disability among adults35.1%30.9–39.1
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.9–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%23.4–30.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.3%17.7–22.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.9%16.6–21.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.4–18.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.4–11.8
Loneliness among adults36.4%31.1–41.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6412.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)15.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)9.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle11.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription90.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate55.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population16.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households42.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$69,772$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$491,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,304$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured