ZIP code
95463
in Navarro, CaliforniaPopulation 14
53.22/ 100
Ranked #11,760 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 37%)
Ranked #872 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 49%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
6.4%
in the bottom 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
18.1 mi
in the top 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
81.6%
in the top 4.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
2.4%
in the top 4.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
18 mi
in the top 5.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST94thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.04%
in the bottom 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Navarro, California (ZIP 95463) lands in the top 37% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,760th) and the bottom 49% of California (872nd).
The profile reads plainly, and several measures carry it: distance to a nursing home resides in the top 4.0% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 4.9% nationally. On the better side, housing-cost burden is at the national minimum, poverty sits at the national minimum, and homeownership lands at the national maximum. Modeled pfas lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum. Modeled tree cover rests in the top 4.3% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled transportation noise resides in the bottom 6.9% nationally.
Put simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. On the overall standing, ZIP 95410, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 73%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 80%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 95%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 41%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 50%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 48%
8%
Disability
healthier than 43%
7%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 6%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 68%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 70%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 61%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 91%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 40%
8%
Disability
healthier than 41%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
95410
Californiashares a border
Score 58.42
Closest healthier
95466
Californiashares a border
Score 53.87
Similar health profile
59732
Montana95% similar profile
Score 53.41
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.2% | 25.7–33.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 39.3% | 35.0–43.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.0% | 9.8–12.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.2% | 8.9–11.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.5% | 7.9–11.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.3% | 6.2–10.9 |
| Depression among adults | 23.3% | 19.7–27.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.0% | 10.8–15.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.6% | 35.2–44.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 27.0% | 20.7–34.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 3.6–5.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.2% | 14.7–21.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.9% | 4.9–10.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 76.8% | 73.5–79.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.2% | 70.9–78.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.7% | 84.1–89.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.4% | 61.4–71.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 63.0% | 59.1–66.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 76.7% | 68.5–83.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.8% | 12.9–18.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.6% | 9.1–16.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 21.2% | 16.5–26.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.0% | 26.9–39.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 21.2% | 16.8–26.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.8% | 14.3–19.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.5% | 12.1–17.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.3% | 11.7–17.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 33.1% | 27.5–39.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.4% | 7.9–11.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.7% | 7.0–10.7 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 15.9% | 12.5–19.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.2% | 3.3–5.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.2–6.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.4% | 18.2–26.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.9% | 9.2–17.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.2% | 9.3–17.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.9% | 7.5–12.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 5.9–9.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.5% | 27.2–38.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 4.6–7.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 51.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.9 yr ± 1.30 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.30 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured