Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95356

in Modesto, CaliforniaPopulation 33,233

50.73/ 100

Ranked #15,232 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #1,021 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #5 of 26 Modesto, CA ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

94%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.1%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

91.8 days/year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

75.5%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.2%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.97 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

91%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

91%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 95356, one of several in Modesto, California comes out in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,232nd) and the bottom 41% of California (1,021st).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: dental providers lies in the top 7.2% nationally. Set against that, modeled nitrate sits in the top 0.2% nationally, fine-particle settles in the top 2.2% nationally, and extreme heat registers in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled pfas stands in the top 3.0% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 6.6% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water resides in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled disaster risk rests in the top 8.5% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water lies in the top 8.5% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 95366, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Modesto, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 1.8 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 74.6 — 73 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,638 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 79.1 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.3–28.1
High blood pressure among adults33.3%29.7–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.3
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Depression among adults20.5%17.5–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.1–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.4–40.3
Obesity among adults33.8%28.0–40.0
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.5–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%8.0–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.7%69.5–75.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.7%69.9–77.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.3–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.1%56.2–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.7%58.2–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%70.3–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.4–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%23.0–30.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%29.5–40.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%19.5–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.6–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.8–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%13.2–16.3
Any disability among adults33.3%29.5–37.3
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.6–17.3
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%22.9–30.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.9–18.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.1%13.2–17.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.9–15.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Loneliness among adults33.6%28.8–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–646.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)10.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate67.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population17.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households45.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$96,886$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$532,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,877$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured