Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

95346

in Mi Wuk Village, CaliforniaPopulation 923

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

59.73/ 100

Ranked #5,054 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #523 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

36.3 mi

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.8%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

38.7 mi

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.8%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

25.8%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mi Wuk Village, California (ZIP 95346) ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,054th) and the top 30% of California (523rd).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and poverty settles at the national minimum. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum. Modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 4.7% nationally, obesity rests in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and housing insecurity lands in the bottom 5.4% nationally. On the other side, distance to an emergency room settles in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled fine-particle rests in the top 1.7% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 2.3% nationally.

For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Among the ZIPs nearby, none ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.5%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%23.4–30.2
High blood pressure among adults34.0%29.9–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.1–12.3
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.8–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%4.7–6.8
Depression among adults22.2%19.0–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.5–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%34.7–43.7
Obesity among adults25.8%19.8–32.9
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.2%4.9–7.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.2%3.4–5.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%72.6–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.1–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.7–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.0%68.4–77.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.7%67.5–73.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%70.3–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.1–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.2%7.4–11.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.8%13.5–20.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%26.3–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%12.8–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.6–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.4–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.6–12.9
Any disability among adults26.0%22.1–30.4
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.2–7.0
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.1–14.3
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%17.7–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.8–9.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.1–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.5–8.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.8
Loneliness among adults29.2%24.5–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.1–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6414.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)8.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households67.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+37.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age56.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$92,057$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$508,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,353$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.9 yr ± 2.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.04 years of 85.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured