Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95345

in Midpines, CaliforniaPopulation 279

51.77/ 100

Ranked #13,737 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #957 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.6%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

26 mi

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Midpines, California (ZIP 95345) places in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,737th) and the bottom 44% of California (957th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 2.7% nationally. Home broadband subscription is at the national maximum. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure registers in the bottom 11.2% nationally. Crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled fine-particle sits in the top 1.8% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled disaster risk rests in the top 14.8% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 95306, about 4.1 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.7%23.5–30.2
High blood pressure among adults34.6%30.4–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.3–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%5.9–8.5
Depression among adults23.1%19.5–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.7–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.2–42.3
Obesity among adults31.7%24.2–39.7
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.4%7.5–11.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.9–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%70.1–77.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%69.1–77.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.4–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%57.7–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.6%61.9–69.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%65.9–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%13.6–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%10.9–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%18.8–27.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%26.8–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%18.6–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.0–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%12.8–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.5–16.8
Any disability among adults31.8%27.2–36.6
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.4–10.0
Mobility disability among adults15.2%12.8–17.9
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.7–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.2–27.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%11.9–17.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.0–18.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.2–14.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.8
Loneliness among adults32.2%27.1–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)3.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)71.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate76.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population7.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households93.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+51.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age65.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$68,464$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$450,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured