Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

94923

in Bodega Bay, CaliforniaPopulation 1,483

62.00/ 100

Ranked #3,518 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.0%)

Ranked #409 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #11 of 34 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$147,546

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

4.9 days/year

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.8%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

14.2%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.7%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.6%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

40.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Bodega Bay, California (ZIP 94923) lands in the top 11.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,518th) and the top 24% of California (409th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: household income stands in the top 4.2% nationally, and modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and transit resides in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 3.8% nationally, industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and loneliness sits in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Poverty rests in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Against that, unemployment is in the top 4.3% nationally, and fatal road crashes stands in the top 6.7% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 94922, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.7 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 44.8 — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,427 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%28.8–36.5
High blood pressure among adults39.5%35.1–44.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.8%12.6–15.2
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.6–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.0–8.6
Depression among adults21.5%18.3–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.6–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%37.1–46.3
Obesity among adults24.8%19.4–30.7
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.5–13.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.3–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.0–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.6–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults92.4%91.3–93.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%67.4–76.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.4%70.4–76.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.0–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.0–14.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.5%7.6–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.1%16.4–24.3
Short sleep duration among adults29.4%24.9–34.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.3–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%11.9–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.8%9.4–12.4
Any disability among adults30.6%26.2–35.1
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.4
Mobility disability among adults16.3%13.8–19.1
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.1–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.7–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.3–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.8–8.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Loneliness among adults27.7%23.5–32.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)10.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)14.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription92.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate72.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population11.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households53.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+27.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age53.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$147,546$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$1,186,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,722$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 1.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.90 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured