Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

93962

in Spreckels, CaliforniaPopulation 174

46.41/ 100

Ranked #20,862 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #1,260 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #20 of 28 Salinas, CA ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

170 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.2 days/year

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.4%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.2%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US17th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

Spreckels, California (ZIP 93962), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 35% nationally (20,862nd) and the bottom 27% of California (1,260th).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: outer-floodplain exposure is at the national maximum, modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 4.5% nationally, and modeled tree cover sits at the national minimum. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 8.6% nationally. On the encouraging side, home broadband subscription lands at the national maximum, and floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum. Walkability lies in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 93908, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salinas, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%25.1–31.7
High blood pressure among adults38.9%34.8–42.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.7–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.0–11.1
Depression among adults22.0%18.8–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%12.9–17.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.3–43.8
Obesity among adults33.4%27.1–40.2
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.8%11.1–16.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.5%10.1–15.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.3%71.0–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.0%70.1–77.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.0–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.8%56.3–66.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.4%54.7–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.4%59.5–76.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.1–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.3–33.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%27.8–39.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.2%25.3–33.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.9–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.5–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.9%15.5–20.3
Any disability among adults36.5%31.7–41.1
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.6–9.8
Independent living disability among adults11.3%9.8–12.8
Mobility disability among adults20.2%17.3–23.1
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%22.9–30.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.1%18.6–26.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.8%19.2–26.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.3–19.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.8–13.1
Loneliness among adults34.0%29.2–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.2–11.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)66.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate75.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population19.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+81.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age68.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$843,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured