Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92655

in Midway City, CaliforniaPopulation 8,026

49.39/ 100

Ranked #17,096 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #1,110 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #296 of 371 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

97.9%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

49.9%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

55.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.3%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

15.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

27.4%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.1%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.0%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

150 intersections/sq mi

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Midway City, California (ZIP 92655), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 47% nationally (17,096th) and the bottom 35% of California (1,110th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 0.2% nationally, modeled colon screening rests in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the top 1.8% nationally. Crowded housing lands in the top 2.0% nationally, homeownership rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise settles in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands at the national minimum. On the stronger side, modeled obesity rests in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and binge drinking settles in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Walkability lands in the top 5.0% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 92647, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.9 ± 3.4 years. A median household income of $66,308 predicts 78.5 years — 4.4 years above.

    Ranked #125 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 11.3; chronic-disease standing 74.8 — 64 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,753 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.8%17.8–21.9
High blood pressure among adults33.4%30.7–36.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.1%4.7–5.7
Current asthma among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Depression among adults17.0%15.0–19.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.9%15.0–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%37.1–43.1
Obesity among adults23.3%20.2–26.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.1%16.8–23.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%11.0–15.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.5%72.8–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.1%70.0–75.9
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.3–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years49.9%45.6–54.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.9%46.8–53.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%64.5–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.0%9.4–12.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.5–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.0%32.3–40.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.6%35.6–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.1%27.1–33.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.4–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.5–18.2
Any disability among adults34.8%31.5–38.3
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.2
Mobility disability among adults18.1%16.1–20.2
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.6
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.0%31.4–38.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.6%23.9–31.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.3%20.1–26.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.4–20.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
Loneliness among adults38.7%35.0–42.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)30.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle14.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription89.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)55.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate27.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)15.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population48.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households42.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age42.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$66,308$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$788,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,609$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.9 yr ± 1.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.72 years of 82.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured