Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92404

in San Bernardino, CaliforniaPopulation 63,243

41.42/ 100

Ranked #25,734 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #1,459 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #125 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

51%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Park land

54.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

51.5%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.6%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.9%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

12.2%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

25.5%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

31.5%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 92404, one of several in San Bernardino, California lands in the bottom 20% nationally (25,734th) and the bottom 15% of California (1,459th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and colon screening resides in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Housing-cost burden registers in the top 2.6% nationally, and modeled disaster risk rests in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled uninsured stands in the top 4.9% nationally, modeled loneliness lies in the top 2.9% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the top 3.7% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the top 5.9% nationally. More encouragingly, park land settles in the top 2.0% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 92325, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.7 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $66,701 predicts 78.5 years — 2.8 years below.

    Ranked #3,836 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.7 ± 0.9 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.5 years — 2.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,218 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.6%19.4–23.8
High blood pressure among adults32.7%29.8–35.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.4–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Depression among adults20.9%18.3–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.6–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.1%30.1–36.0
Obesity among adults37.0%32.5–41.6
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%13.9–20.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.6%17.5–21.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.9%63.8–69.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.0%64.5–71.2
Cholesterol screening among adults80.4%78.4–82.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.0%46.6–55.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.5%45.3–51.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.4%63.6–76.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.1–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%13.3–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.3%27.8–34.9
Short sleep duration among adults40.3%36.0–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.5%28.8–34.3
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.2–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.9–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.3%18.4–22.3
Any disability among adults36.6%33.3–40.0
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.5–12.7
Mobility disability among adults16.8%15.1–18.6
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.4–6.3
Vision disability among adults9.1%8.4–9.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.9%29.6–36.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.4%29.5–35.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.9%28.2–33.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.5%23.0–28.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.1%14.5–17.7
Loneliness among adults40.9%37.0–44.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6414.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)27.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)51.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate50.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population22.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households36.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+10.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age32.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$66,701$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$426,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,476$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 0.4478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.44 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured