ZIP code
92267
in Parker Dam, CaliforniaPopulation 0
36.31/ 100
Ranked #28,850 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.1%)
Ranked #1,594 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 7.3%)
Ranked #140 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 8.5%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Industrial-pollution burden
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
117.9 days/year
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
100.6 mi
in the top 3.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
13.5%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 4.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS4thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Mammography
67.7%
in the bottom 7.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST4thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
18.5%
in the top 7.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.5%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.3%
in the top 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Parker Dam, California (ZIP 92267) lands in the bottom 10.1% nationally (28,850th) and the bottom 7.3% of California (1,594th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled extreme heat lands in the top 0.8% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled tree cover sits at the national minimum, and mammography rests in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Modeled arsenic is in the top 7.3% nationally, stroke stands in the top 7.8% nationally, and mobility disability settles in the top 8.7% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies at the national minimum, distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss lands in the bottom 4.2% nationally.
To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 85344, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 56%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 2%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 16%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 14%
8%
Disability
healthier than 8%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 13%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 5%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 3%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 38%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 6%
8%
Disability
healthier than 8%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 11%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 89%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 55%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 49%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 3%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 10%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85344
Arizonashares a border
Score 40.85
Closest healthier
86406
Arizonashares a border
Score 51.65
Similar health profile
74865
Oklahoma95% similar profile
Score 42.87
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.3% | 32.2–38.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.6% | 38.2–44.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.1% | 9.9–12.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.0% | 10.6–13.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.1% | 8.7–11.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.4% | 9.3–13.9 |
| Depression among adults | 25.2% | 22.2–28.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.5% | 11.7–15.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.4% | 36.9–43.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 32.8% | 28.6–37.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.5% | 4.6–6.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.3% | 15.1–21.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.2% | 6.0–10.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.1% | 74.0–79.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.1% | 70.6–77.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.1% | 82.7–87.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 58.2% | 53.5–63.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.2% | 55.0–61.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 67.7% | 60.1–74.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.5% | 11.4–15.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.7% | 14.6–21.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.7% | 24.1–33.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.4% | 30.5–38.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.3% | 24.9–34.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.4% | 18.2–22.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.2% | 16.6–21.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.5% | 16.7–22.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 41.3% | 36.6–46.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.4% | 9.1–11.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.5% | 11.3–16.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.3% | 18.8–25.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.1–7.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.3–9.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.6% | 24.1–31.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.9% | 15.0–22.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 21.5% | 17.0–26.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.0% | 10.7–15.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.1% | 8.5–11.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.8% | 33.6–42.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 6.3–8.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | — | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | — | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | — | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | — | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | — | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.6 yr ± 2.59 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.59 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured