Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92122

in San Diego, CaliforniaPopulation 45,411

66.50/ 100

Ranked #1,443 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.6%)

Ranked #203 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 11.9%)

Ranked #23 of 106 San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

19.8%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

23.5%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.6%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.4%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

34.4%

in the bottom 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.0%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.0%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.1%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.2%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 92122, one of several in San Diego, California sits in the top 4.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,443rd) and the top 11.9% of California (203rd).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled obesity is in the bottom 0.9% nationally, high blood pressure rests in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and high cholesterol sits in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the bottom 2.4% nationally, lead in tap water lands at the national minimum, and modeled coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and energy burden settles in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Working the other way, modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 2.7% nationally, and homeownership is in the bottom 3.9% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 92037, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 38.4; chronic-disease standing 98.3 (top 10%) — 60 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,397 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults15.9%14.5–17.5
High blood pressure among adults23.5%21.6–25.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Current asthma among adults8.4%7.6–9.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Depression among adults20.7%18.6–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.4%27.2–32.0
Obesity among adults19.8%17.3–22.8
Stroke among adults2.1%2.0–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.0–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.5–6.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure64.7%62.3–67.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.5%68.7–74.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.6–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.3%62.6–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.5%63.7–69.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%72.3–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%14.1–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.7%14.7–19.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%29.1–35.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.3%12.8–16.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.4–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults9.3%8.4–10.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%11.2–13.9
Any disability among adults23.1%20.9–25.6
Hearing disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.2
Mobility disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.2%24.6–30.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.7–14.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.7–8.5
Loneliness among adults37.2%34.0–40.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)3.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)74.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle8.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription97.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate34.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population32.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households53.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+14.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age31.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$105,177$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$1,046,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$2,731$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured