ZIP code
92091
in Rancho Santa Fe, CaliforniaPopulation 972
70.32/ 100
Ranked #527 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.7%)
Ranked #84 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 4.9%)
Ranked #7 of 106 San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA ZIPs (top 6.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Utility shut-off threat
2.5%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
4.7%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
5.1%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
3.6%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Obesity
21.2%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Dental provider access
1.9 per 1,000 residents
in the top 1.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
26.2%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Recreation access
1.9 per 1,000 residents
in the top 1.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
52.9%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
8.6%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 92091, one of several in Rancho Santa Fe, California sits in the top 1.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (527th) and the top 4.9% of California (84th).
A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 0.2% nationally, housing insecurity resides in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the bottom 0.6% nationally, modeled obesity resides in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and dental providers sits in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and recreation resides in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, housing-cost burden stands in the top 2.3% nationally.
Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 92014, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 75%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 92%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 98%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.3%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 94%
8%
Disability
healthier than 91%
7%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 56%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 43%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 88%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 93%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.5%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.7%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 95%
8%
Disability
healthier than 87%
7%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 40%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 43%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 86%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.00%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.00%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 72%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 7%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 17%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
92014
Californiashares a border
Score 74.70
Closest healthier
92067
Californiashares a border
Score 71.38
Similar health profile
20838
Maryland99% similar profile
Score 67.50
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.1% | 26.5–31.9 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 35.6% | 32.8–38.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 14.2% | 13.0–15.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 8.9% | 7.9–10.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.9% | 6.0–7.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.0% | 4.1–6.2 |
| Depression among adults | 20.1% | 18.0–22.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.8% | 8.6–11.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.2% | 38.3–44.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 21.2% | 18.4–24.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.3% | 2.9–3.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 3.9% | 3.1–4.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 2.8% | 2.2–3.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.2% | 75.4–81.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.4% | 79.3–83.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 93.1% | 92.0–94.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.6% | 70.1–76.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 78.7% | 76.5–80.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 82.3% | 77.5–86.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.5% | 11.8–15.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 5.9% | 4.5–7.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 14.2% | 11.8–16.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 26.2% | 23.3–29.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 13.2% | 11.1–15.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 11.6% | 10.3–13.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.6% | 9.2–12.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 8.6% | 7.4–10.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 24.0% | 21.0–27.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.1% | 6.3–8.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 5.4% | 4.5–6.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.8% | 9.9–14.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.6% | 2.2–3.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.1% | 2.7–3.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.4% | 16.9–22.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 5.1% | 4.0–6.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 4.7% | 3.5–6.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 4.7% | 3.8–5.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 3.6% | 3.0–4.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.9% | 25.9–32.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 2.5% | 2.1–3.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 7.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 14.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 80.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 10.8% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 87.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 52.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 68.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.2% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 26.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 83.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 44.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 63.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $103,452 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | $1,487,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $3,501 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured