Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

91706

in Irwindale, CaliforniaPopulation 71,082

48.21/ 100

Ranked #18,663 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #1,184 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #310 of 371 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

48.3%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

43.5%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

20.6%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.1%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.5 mi

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Irwindale, California (ZIP 91706) ranks in the bottom 42% nationally (18,663rd) and the bottom 31% of California (1,184th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled colon screening rests in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and loneliness is in the top 1.0% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 2.6% nationally, fine-particle resides in the top 4.4% nationally, and tree cover lands at the national minimum. Modeled uninsured registers in the top 6.3% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Better still, floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 91006, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.4 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $81,122 predicts 79.3 years — 2.1 years above.

    Ranked #884 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 1.8 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 90.6 (top 10%) — 89 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,802 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 81.4 ± 1.2 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.9%16.4–19.3
High blood pressure among adults29.3%27.3–31.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Current asthma among adults8.4%7.6–9.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.0
Depression among adults17.6%15.8–19.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%13.3–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%35.1–39.5
Obesity among adults27.3%24.5–30.1
Stroke among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.5–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.2%16.4–20.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.3%67.9–72.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.3%66.9–71.7
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%80.3–83.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years48.3%44.6–51.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.5%50.8–55.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%67.7–77.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.6–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.7–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.0%30.4–35.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%34.6–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.8%27.7–32.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%15.2–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.5–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%16.2–19.3
Any disability among adults35.4%32.9–37.8
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.5%15.2–17.9
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.8–9.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.7%33.1–38.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.0%26.6–31.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.2%21.1–25.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%20.7–24.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.7–14.3
Loneliness among adults43.5%40.8–46.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6412.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)31.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate58.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)20.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population43.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households38.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+15.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age38.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$81,122$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$609,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,866$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured