ZIP code
88118
in Floyd, New MexicoPopulation 329
35.14/ 100
Ranked #29,337 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.6%)
Ranked #291 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 13.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
62.2%
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST12thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
13.6%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
12.4%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Nitrate in drinking water
49.6%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.4%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
7.6%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
14.0%
in the top 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.96 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST13thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
9.9%
in the top 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST75thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
24.8%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, Floyd, New Mexico (ZIP 88118) sits in the bottom 8.6% nationally (29,337th) and the bottom 13.7% of New Mexico (291st).
A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled mammography lands in the bottom 1.2% nationally, hearing disability rests in the top 1.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease settles in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled nitrate lands in the top 0.9% nationally, stroke rests in the top 2.5% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 4.1% nationally, and walkability rests in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability settles in the top 5.1% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 3.8% nationally.
Put plainly, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 88116, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 61%
14%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 57%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 55%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 6%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 30%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 7%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 27%
8%
Disability
healthier than 2%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 15%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 58%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 44%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 9%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 28%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 23%
8%
Disability
healthier than 14%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 25%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
88116
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 38.54
Closest healthier
88124
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 41.75
Similar health profile
88052
New Mexico98% similar profile
Score 33.84
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.8% | 33.1–40.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.6% | 40.3–48.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.8% | 9.7–12.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.9% | 9.6–12.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 12.4% | 10.9–14.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.4% | 11.1–15.7 |
| Depression among adults | 25.4% | 21.7–29.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 17.8% | 15.4–20.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.0% | 38.4–47.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.0% | 29.0–43.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.4% | 5.6–7.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.8% | 17.1–24.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 15.3% | 12.2–18.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.5% | 76.6–82.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 71.3% | 67.3–75.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 82.7% | 80.3–85.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 57.1% | 51.8–62.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 60.5% | 56.8–64.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 62.2% | 52.8–70.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.5% | 9.4–13.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.7% | 15.5–22.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.7% | 27.8–39.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.1% | 27.3–39.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 31.1% | 26.5–35.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.9% | 15.6–20.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 20.6% | 17.9–23.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.4% | 16.6–22.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 45.9% | 40.4–51.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 13.6% | 12.0–15.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 14.0% | 11.9–16.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.8% | 21.1–28.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.5–8.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 9.9% | 8.5–11.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.1% | 19.7–26.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 23.6% | 19.6–27.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 23.5% | 19.3–27.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.6% | 13.2–18.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.1% | 10.4–13.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.8% | 29.0–39.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.2% | 10.4–14.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 17.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 3.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 10.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 14.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347 |
| Broadband subscription | 84.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 83.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 27.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 18.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347 |
| Homeownership rate | 89.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352 |
| Single-parent households | 66.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339 |
| Population 65+ | 40.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352 |
| Median age | 64.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339 |
| Median household income | $57,650 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265 |
| Median home value | $220,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255 |
| Median gross rent | $667 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $917 ($549–$1,408) n=173 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.1 yr ± 1.29 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.29 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured