Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88043

in Hurley, New MexicoPopulation 1,210

49.13/ 100

Ranked #17,481 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #140 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

48.2 mi

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.4%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

73.8 mi

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.6 days/year

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.9%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.5%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST53rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$34,236

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Hurley, New Mexico (ZIP 88043) lands in the bottom 45% nationally (17,481st) and the top 42% of New Mexico (140th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 0.9% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 5.9% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 8.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled uninsured registers in the top 6.0% nationally, and vision disability resides in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 8.8% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. On the overall standing, ZIP 88026, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.6%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 99.4 (top 1%); chronic-disease standing 48.0 — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,380 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%25.6–32.5
High blood pressure among adults37.9%33.6–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.1–8.7
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.3–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Depression among adults20.8%17.6–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.7%14.6–19.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%33.5–42.6
Obesity among adults35.5%28.2–43.5
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.2–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.4%15.3–22.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.0–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.4%67.0–75.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.6–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.0%53.7–64.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.3%52.4–60.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.5%60.2–76.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%9.8–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%10.7–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%25.7–36.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%27.0–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.6%24.2–31.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.1–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.5–17.6
Any disability among adults37.0%32.3–42.0
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Mobility disability among adults19.0%16.5–21.7
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.3–6.6
Vision disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%19.7–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.2%19.7–26.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.9%15.8–22.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.2–20.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.9–12.9
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.1–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.3–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription80.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate88.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households62.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+36.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age59.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$34,236$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$93,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$545$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 1.9978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.99 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured