ZIP code
87583
in Villanueva, New MexicoPopulation 308
40.37/ 100
Ranked #26,500 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranked #248 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 26%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Energy-cost burden
8.5%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
49.7%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST12thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
23.5%
in the top 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
11.3%
in the top 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
42.2 mi
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Mammography
64.6%
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST24thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
33.9%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
6.8%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
53.3%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST10thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›The read
Villanueva, New Mexico (ZIP 87583), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 17% nationally (26,500th) and the bottom 26% of New Mexico (248th).
A rural profile defined by a handful of clear readings: modeled energy burden is in the top 0.6% nationally, colon screening lies in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and uninsured registers in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 2.9% nationally, distance to an emergency room lies in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled mammography registers in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 3.5% nationally, and slow internet speeds lies in the top 1.9% nationally. Home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 1.9% nationally. On the stronger side, housing-cost burden is at the national minimum.
Set within its surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 87560, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.02%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 82%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 85%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 34%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 2%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 37%
11%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.00%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 77%
8%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 45%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 38%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 15%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 20%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 22%
11%
Disability
healthier than 22%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 15%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
87560
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 40.37
Closest healthier
87569
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 44.35
Similar health profile
87930
New Mexico98% similar profile
Score 42.77
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 28.0% | 24.5–31.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 39.3% | 34.8–43.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.4% | 5.7–7.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.1% | 8.0–10.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.6% | 8.3–10.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.4% | 6.2–8.8 |
| Depression among adults | 19.4% | 16.3–22.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.8% | 17.1–22.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.4% | 33.7–43.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.7% | 31.9–47.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.0% | 4.3–5.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 21.2% | 17.5–25.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 23.5% | 18.3–29.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 75.2% | 71.3–78.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 69.3% | 64.5–73.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.9% | 81.0–86.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 49.7% | 43.9–55.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 49.8% | 45.9–53.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 64.6% | 55.7–73.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.4% | 10.0–15.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.1% | 12.3–18.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.1% | 30.2–42.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.5% | 32.0–45.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 33.9% | 29.0–39.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.4% | 13.4–17.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.7% | 17.0–22.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.8% | 15.1–20.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.0% | 36.5–47.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.8% | 9.4–12.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.2% | 9.5–13.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.4% | 18.9–26.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.5% | 6.4–8.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 11.3% | 9.7–13.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.4% | 23.3–32.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 29.4% | 24.3–35.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.8% | 18.5–27.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.7% | 18.2–25.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 13.6% | 11.6–16.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.7% | 29.4–40.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 13.8% | 11.8–16.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 6.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 11.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 34.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347 |
| Broadband subscription | 53.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 83.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 18.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347 |
| Homeownership rate | 81.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 4.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352 |
| Single-parent households | 75.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339 |
| Population 65+ | 54.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352 |
| Median age | 67.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $917 ($549–$1,408) n=173 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.7 yr ± 2.26 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.26 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured