ZIP code
85708
in Tucson, ArizonaPopulation 4,312
51.75/ 100
Ranked #13,765 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)
Ranked #173 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 44%)
Ranked #25 of 46 Tucson, AZ ZIPs (bottom 46%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
20.8%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
16.6%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
49.1%
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST17thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
1.8%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
3.5%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
1.1%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
85.9%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
0.58%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
5.1%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
21.9%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, ZIP 85708, one of several in Tucson, Arizona places in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,765th) and the top 44% of Arizona (173rd).
The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled high cholesterol sits in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and diabetes resides in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled stroke is in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 1.7% nationally, slow internet speeds registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and homeownership settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled binge drinking sits in the top 1.9% nationally.
Beside the areas that surround it, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 85707, just across the boundary. Further still, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tucson, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 99%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
Disability
healthier than 91%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 66%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 1%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 33%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 20%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.8%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 72%
14%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 63%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 29%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 14%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 21%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 70%
14%
Disability
healthier than 98%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 64%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 21%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 9%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 37%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85707
Arizonashares a border
Score 59.27
Closest healthier
85747
Arizonashares a border
Score 60.44
Similar health profile
78236
Texas98% similar profile
Score 52.27
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 9.8% | 8.8–10.9 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 16.6% | 14.9–18.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 2.5% | 2.3–2.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.9% | 10.7–13.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 1.8% | 1.6–2.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.0% | 2.6–3.4 |
| Depression among adults | 28.8% | 25.8–31.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 3.5% | 3.1–3.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 20.8% | 18.9–22.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 28.8% | 25.1–32.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.1% | 1.0–1.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 15.0% | 12.6–17.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.4% | 8.4–12.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 41.4% | 38.3–44.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 65.2% | 61.4–68.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 75.0% | 71.7–77.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 49.1% | 45.3–52.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 52.7% | 49.6–55.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.4% | 64.6–75.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 21.9% | 19.0–24.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 10.5% | 8.7–12.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 15.7% | 13.4–18.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 42.4% | 38.3–46.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 13.4% | 11.6–15.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.9% | 20.4–25.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 9.4% | 8.2–10.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.6% | 16.1–21.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.9% | 23.7–30.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 3.4% | 3.0–3.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.0% | 6.0–8.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 5.1% | 4.5–5.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.8% | 1.6–2.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.5% | 3.1–3.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 29.6% | 26.3–33.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.6% | 12.2–17.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.4% | 8.6–12.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.0% | 11.0–15.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.3% | 8.8–11.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 39.8% | 36.2–43.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.6% | 7.4–9.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 3.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 8.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 2.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 29.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 16.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 96.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 57.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 0.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.6% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 23.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 0.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 23.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | $63,919 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | $1,712 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured