ZIP code
85654
in Rillito, ArizonaPopulation 0
58.48/ 100
Ranked #6,001 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)
Ranked #91 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 23%)
Ranked #15 of 46 Tucson, AZ ZIPs (top 33%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
98.3 days/year
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST57thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
14.9%
in the top 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
20.3 mi
in the top 4.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST82ndUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
12.4%
in the bottom 9.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST27thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
1.8%
in the bottom 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST15thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, Rillito, Arizona (ZIP 85654) stands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,001st) and the top 23% of Arizona (91st), based on limited data; treat as directional.
A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled expected annual loss lands in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and disaster risk settles in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled extreme heat lands in the top 1.6% nationally, transportation noise settles in the top 4.4% nationally, and tree cover rests at the national minimum. Fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 85658, less than a tenth of a mile away, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tucson, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 71%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 88%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 66%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 91%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 61%
8%
Disability
healthier than 81%
7%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 55%
13%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 20%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 67%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 82%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 75%
11%
Disability
healthier than 85%
7%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 41%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 52%
5%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 26%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 74%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 70%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 71%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 71%
11%
Disability
healthier than 78%
7%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 52%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 15%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85653
Arizonashares a border
Score 47.57
Closest healthier
85658
Arizonaless than 0.1 mi away
Score 61.89
Similar health profile
67050
Kansas97% similar profile
Score 55.85
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 26.7% | 24.2–29.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 34.0% | 31.3–36.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.2% | 8.2–10.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.0% | 10.8–13.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.2% | 4.4–6.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.6% | 4.4–7.0 |
| Depression among adults | 23.1% | 20.5–25.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.2% | 8.8–11.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.7% | 34.7–40.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 32.2% | 28.1–36.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.1% | 2.7–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.6% | 7.1–10.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.3% | 6.1–11.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 75.3% | 72.4–77.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.8% | 77.3–82.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.4% | 88.7–91.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.3% | 61.7–68.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.8% | 62.1–67.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.6% | 66.0–76.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.4% | 10.7–14.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 8.9% | 6.7–11.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 18.7% | 15.5–22.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.3% | 34.6–42.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.2% | 13.5–19.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.5% | 13.4–17.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.2% | 10.5–14.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.4% | 10.3–14.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 28.2% | 24.5–32.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.0% | 5.2–6.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.3–7.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 12.3% | 10.2–14.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.2% | 2.6–3.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.4% | 3.7–5.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.3% | 21.1–27.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.7% | 8.9–14.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.5% | 6.1–11.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.4% | 8.1–12.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 5.9–8.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.3% | 27.7–35.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 5.7–8.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | — | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | — | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | — | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | — | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | — | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.9 yr ± 1.91 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.91 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured