Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

83833

in Harrison, IdahoPopulation 1,365

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

55.31/ 100

Ranked #9,077 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #59 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #3 of 11 Coeur d'Alene, ID ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

24.9%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.7%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.7%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.5%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

8.9 days/year

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Park land

20.2%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.67 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Harrison, Idaho (ZIP 83833), by its composite score, sits in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,077th) and the top 22% of Idaho (59th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and housing insecurity sits in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled pfas lies in the bottom 4.2% nationally, and humid heat rests in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Park land resides in the top 6.9% nationally, modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and civic lands in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled hearing disability registers in the top 2.6% nationally, and fine-particle settles in the top 2.6% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 83815, about 3.1 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Coeur d'Alene, ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.7%34.0–41.3
High blood pressure among adults38.1%34.2–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.5%12.2–14.8
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.0–10.2
Depression among adults20.8%17.9–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%10.6–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.2–44.8
Obesity among adults30.9%26.2–35.7
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%9.8–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.0–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.4–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.5–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.7%88.3–91.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%66.3–74.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.2%67.2–73.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.9%62.1–75.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.5–14.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%8.2–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%16.0–23.4
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%26.9–34.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%14.7–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults12.6%10.8–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.0–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.1–13.9
Any disability among adults35.6%30.9–39.9
Hearing disability among adults12.7%11.1–14.2
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.3–8.8
Mobility disability among adults18.2%15.2–21.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.3–4.7
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.4%14.7–20.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.8–10.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.9–7.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.3–7.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Loneliness among adults24.9%21.4–28.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.8–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–644.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription97.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate89.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population7.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households83.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+33.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age59.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$81,568$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$562,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,063$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 1.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.36 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured