Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83467

in Salmon, IdahoPopulation 6,590

48.71/ 100

Ranked #18,068 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #171 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

64.3 mi

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.8%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.81 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10.2 per million

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.65 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.5 days/year

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.9 pCi/L

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Salmon, Idaho (ZIP 83467) ranks in the bottom 44% nationally (18,068th) and the bottom 36% of Idaho (171st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled hearing disability resides in the top 2.1% nationally, and fine-particle lands in the top 2.5% nationally. On the stronger side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 0.6% nationally, and outpatient sits in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers stands in the top 5.9% nationally, childcare settles in the top 6.1% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 9.0% nationally.

In plainer terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 59725, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.5%32.8–40.1
High blood pressure among adults39.9%35.7–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.5–12.8
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.3–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Depression among adults22.5%19.3–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.2–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%35.5–44.2
Obesity among adults31.1%25.2–37.4
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.1%12.2–18.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.7–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%74.7–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.7–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.1–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%61.0–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%61.4–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%60.8–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%10.6–15.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.1–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.9%22.7–31.4
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%25.2–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.3%17.6–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.5–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.2–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.7–17.4
Any disability among adults38.9%34.4–43.4
Hearing disability among adults12.9%11.6–14.4
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Mobility disability among adults19.8%17.4–22.5
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.7–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.3–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Loneliness among adults28.3%24.1–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle6.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription91.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate78.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households59.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+28.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age51.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$53,917$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$316,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$753$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 1.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.79 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured