Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83101

in Kemmerer, WyomingPopulation 3,731

52.24/ 100

Ranked #13,131 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #64 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

63.2%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST24th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

2 days/year

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

29.3 mi

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.36 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

27.6 mi

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

10.5%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.36 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

11.3%

in the top 14.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Kemmerer, Wyoming (ZIP 83101) ranks in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,131st) and the top 41% of Wyoming (64th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Elder services resides in the top 3.7% nationally, and dental providers lands in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 10.0% nationally, and pharmacy rests in the top 10.2% nationally. On the other hand, modeled mammography is in the bottom 1.7% nationally, distance to an emergency room stands in the top 2.1% nationally, and distance to a community health center settles in the top 4.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 83114, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.2–30.4
High blood pressure among adults35.3%31.3–39.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%6.6–9.2
Depression among adults20.2%16.9–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.2–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.7%30.7–38.7
Obesity among adults36.7%30.0–43.1
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%8.8–13.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.4%8.2–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.2%69.3–76.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.6%65.1–73.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.3–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.0%55.8–66.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.4%59.7–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.2%54.5–71.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.1–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%12.6–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.1–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%26.8–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.3%15.5–21.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.4–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.2–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.2–16.4
Any disability among adults29.4%25.2–33.6
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.1–9.2
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.8–9.2
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.7–16.1
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6411.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle6.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription77.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate77.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households51.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+23.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$76,947$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$191,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$824$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 1.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.79 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured