Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82845

in Wyarno, WyomingPopulation 55

58.54/ 100

Ranked #5,963 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #16 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (top 10.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.3%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

104.7 mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

48%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.9%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Wyarno, Wyoming (ZIP 82845), by its overall standing, sits in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,963rd) and the top 10.4% of Wyoming (16th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 0.2% nationally, poverty settles at the national minimum, and homeownership registers at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and modeled short sleep is in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 3.4% nationally. Set against that, walkability rests in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 4.8% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Locally, no neighbor ranks healthier overall than this ZIP.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%22.9–29.4
High blood pressure among adults31.7%28.1–35.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.3–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.2–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.3–8.4
Depression among adults25.6%21.9–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.4–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.1%28.6–35.8
Obesity among adults30.6%24.9–36.7
Stroke among adults3.0%2.5–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.6–10.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%5.8–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.9%71.2–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.1%68.0–75.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%82.2–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%58.9–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.0%67.6–74.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%67.2–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.3–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.9%9.6–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.1%16.7–26.1
Short sleep duration among adults27.3%22.6–32.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.8%12.7–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%13.7–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%10.6–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%10.8–15.8
Any disability among adults27.8%23.3–32.6
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.0–8.2
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.6–8.3
Mobility disability among adults11.1%8.9–13.7
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.4–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.6%2.9–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6421.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age43.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 1.4178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.41 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured