Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

81652

in Silt, ColoradoPopulation 6,271

56.07/ 100

Ranked #8,194 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #235 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

25%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.3%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.9%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.1%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

10.1%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Silt, Colorado (ZIP 81652) lands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,194th) and the top 47% of Colorado (235th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: modeled obesity stands in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and short sleep lies in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol is in the bottom 6.3% nationally, poverty settles in the bottom 11.3% nationally, and modeled diabetes resides in the bottom 9.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 13.9% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon rests in the top 11.4% nationally, and distance to an emergency room stands in the top 11.5% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 81647, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.2%21.1–27.5
High blood pressure among adults27.3%23.6–31.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Depression among adults22.1%18.5–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.7–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.9%27.6–36.2
Obesity among adults25.0%18.9–31.9
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%10.6–16.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%11.7–16.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.8%64.6–72.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.4%65.9–74.7
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%81.7–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.4%54.3–64.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.9%57.4–64.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%63.2–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.1–22.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.2–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.1%15.5–23.2
Short sleep duration among adults28.2%23.0–34.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%15.4–21.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.0–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%11.9–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.5–17.8
Any disability among adults29.0%24.8–33.6
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.0–13.7
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–6422.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate82.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population14.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households48.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+10.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age39.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$101,038$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$530,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$1,873$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 1.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.8–83.2) n=466

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured