Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

81419

in Hotchkiss, ColoradoPopulation 3,646

51.80/ 100

Ranked #13,705 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #320 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.27 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.27 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.9%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST31st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Park land

15.7%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST66th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Hotchkiss, Colorado (ZIP 81419) sits in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,705th) and the bottom 36% of Colorado (320th).

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, grocery registers in the top 4.3% nationally, and elder services is in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the bottom 8.4% nationally, park land registers in the top 8.6% nationally, and floodplain exposure is in the bottom 12.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 13.9% nationally. Against that, modeled mammography registers in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and radon is in the top 12.5% nationally. Walkability lies in the bottom 10.8% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 81410, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%30.9–38.5
High blood pressure among adults37.9%33.6–42.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.7%10.6–13.0
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.3
Depression among adults23.9%20.4–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.2–43.3
Obesity among adults26.6%20.4–33.6
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.2–14.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.0–11.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%73.6–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.2–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.5–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%60.8–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%59.3–66.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.9%58.3–76.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%11.9–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%11.9–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%17.5–25.7
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%25.5–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%17.2–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.0–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.6–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.9–16.4
Any disability among adults33.4%29.2–38.4
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.6–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–6419.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription80.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate89.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households60.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+30.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age54.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$59,735$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$364,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$1,314$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.8–83.2) n=466

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured