Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

81062

in Olney Springs, ColoradoPopulation 2,000

39.94/ 100

Ranked #26,806 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #492 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (bottom 2.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

47.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

23.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.8%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.86 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

8.4%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.3%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

21.3 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

17.4 per million

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Olney Springs, Colorado (ZIP 81062) lands in the bottom 16% nationally (26,806th) and the bottom 2.0% of Colorado (492nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and uninsured lands in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled mammography sits in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and walkability is in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the top 3.3% nationally, modeled nitrate resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and distance to an emergency room registers in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover rests at the national minimum. On the better side, modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 6.5% nationally.

A note on the terms: nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 80833, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.07%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 30%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.4%17.7–23.2
High blood pressure among adults30.9%26.8–35.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.4–8.6
Depression among adults20.7%17.3–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.6–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.3%26.3–34.4
Obesity among adults34.0%26.0–42.3
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.9%18.7–27.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years23.1%18.8–27.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure61.4%57.5–65.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults63.4%58.5–68.3
Cholesterol screening among adults74.7%71.3–77.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years47.4%41.6–53.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.0%38.1–46.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.8%53.6–73.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.0%17.3–25.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.0%18.4–25.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.4%21.7–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%30.2–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.0%22.4–30.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%16.7–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.6–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.4%17.6–23.4
Any disability among adults36.2%31.1–41.6
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.3–11.1
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.5–15.5
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.8
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–6415.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)24.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription80.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate72.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households61.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age38.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$56,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$127,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$1,092$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.8–83.2) n=466

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured