Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

80623

in Gilcrest, ColoradoPopulation 1,026

49.41/ 100

Ranked #17,062 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #381 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #20 of 34 Greeley, CO ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

98.2 per million

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.1%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.52%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.4%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

29.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

30.7 days/year

in the top 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Gilcrest, Colorado (ZIP 80623) ranks in the bottom 47% nationally (17,062nd) and the bottom 24% of Colorado (381st).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 0.08% nationally, and uninsured stands in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum, and fine-particle lies in the top 5.8% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the stronger side, fatal road crashes lands at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure rests in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 80651, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Greeley, CO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 3.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 83.7 — 80 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,197 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.0%19.6–24.6
High blood pressure among adults29.4%26.3–32.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.0–7.0
Depression among adults20.9%18.3–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.0–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.4%29.4–35.8
Obesity among adults36.0%31.1–41.0
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.9%7.3–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.1%15.5–23.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.3%65.8–72.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.0%63.4–70.6
Cholesterol screening among adults81.9%79.3–84.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.6%56.7–64.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.4%55.3–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%65.7–78.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.5–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.5–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%21.3–29.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.9%30.9–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%17.9–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.3–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.6–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.2–19.9
Any disability among adults33.3%29.2–37.5
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.5
Mobility disability among adults13.2%11.2–15.3
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.6
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–6418.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)22.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription86.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population27.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households54.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age35.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$321,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$1,682$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth88.0 yr ± 3.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.8–83.2) n=466

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.00 years of 88.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured