Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

80432

in Como, ColoradoPopulation 293

62.96/ 100

Ranked #2,992 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.4%)

Ranked #102 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #52 of 127 Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

0.2 days/year

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

31.6 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.7%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

32.7 mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.4%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

48.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.5%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Como, Colorado (ZIP 80432) sits in the top 9.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,992nd) and the top 20% of Colorado (102nd).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 0.2% nationally, modeled obesity rests in the bottom 2.7% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 1.7% nationally. Homeownership lands at the national maximum, home broadband subscription rests at the national maximum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and pfas rests in the bottom 4.1% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a nursing home settles in the top 1.4% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 3.8% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 80448, about 4.0 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.1–35.0
High blood pressure among adults32.7%28.2–37.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.5–12.8
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.4–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%4.7–7.0
Depression among adults20.2%16.8–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.1–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%33.6–42.8
Obesity among adults22.7%16.8–29.0
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.0%5.4–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.6–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%72.0–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%72.9–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults91.9%90.6–93.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.7%64.4–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.8%67.2–74.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%62.8–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.0–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.7%7.4–12.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.0%10.9–17.4
Short sleep duration among adults27.4%21.2–34.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.0%10.7–15.5
Frequent mental distress among adults13.2%11.2–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.1–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.3%8.7–12.0
Any disability among adults24.2%20.1–28.5
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.5–6.3
Mobility disability among adults10.5%8.6–12.6
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.3–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.7–3.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–6477.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population27.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households50.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+29.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age53.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$44,605$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$403,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 2.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.8–83.2) n=466

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.42 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured