Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

79601

in Abilene, TexasPopulation 28,050

45.60/ 100

Ranked #21,782 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #900 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #14 of 24 Abilene, TX ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

102.7 mi

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

85.7 days/year

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.8%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

406 units

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

49.2%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.7%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST29th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

26.5%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 79601, one of several in Abilene, Texas, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 32% nationally (21,782nd) and the top 48% of Texas (900th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled disaster risk registers in the top 2.0% nationally, uninsured stands in the top 5.4% nationally, and extreme heat lands in the top 4.1% nationally. Slow internet speeds is in the top 4.2% nationally, homeownership resides in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the bottom 8.6% nationally. More positively, physicians lies in the top 3.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 3.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 5.8% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 79510, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Abilene, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.0%18.1–22.0
High blood pressure among adults31.7%28.9–34.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.2–6.1
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%5.1–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Depression among adults23.6%20.7–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.9–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.2%29.3–35.2
Obesity among adults35.6%29.7–41.7
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%14.1–19.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.0%16.9–21.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.6%67.5–71.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.7%67.3–73.9
Cholesterol screening among adults78.7%76.6–80.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.7%53.5–61.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.4%43.5–49.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.5%64.2–78.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%16.6–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.7–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%24.3–31.4
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%34.5–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%20.3–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.3–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%12.2–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%16.6–20.4
Any disability among adults33.8%30.4–37.5
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.9–10.9
Mobility disability among adults13.3%12.0–14.6
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.7–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6420.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)15.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate49.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population7.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households46.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+10.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age29.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$53,631$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$190,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,031$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured