Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

79045

in Hereford, TexasPopulation 18,189

41.99/ 100

Ranked #25,215 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #1,295 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

34.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.1%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

99 µg/L

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.7%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.4%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.89%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.4%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hereford, Texas (ZIP 79045) ranks in the bottom 21% nationally (25,215th) and the bottom 31% of Texas (1,295th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled uninsured resides in the top 0.6% nationally, and disaster risk stands in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled vision disability sits in the top 4.7% nationally, and lithium in drinking water resides in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, colon screening sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled nitrate stands in the top 6.6% nationally. More positively, distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband resides in the top 7.6% nationally.

Against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 79001, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.4%20.7–26.3
High blood pressure among adults36.2%32.2–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Depression among adults20.8%17.6–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.7%14.8–18.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%33.3–42.0
Obesity among adults40.6%32.0–49.6
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.4–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years34.2%30.2–38.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.9–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.8%67.5–75.8
Cholesterol screening among adults81.2%78.8–83.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.2%48.7–59.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.8%39.1–46.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.7%56.4–74.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%12.9–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.7–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.6%34.4–45.1
Short sleep duration among adults40.8%33.3–48.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.4%29.0–35.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.1–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.5–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.4–21.8
Any disability among adults39.9%35.2–44.5
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Independent living disability among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Mobility disability among adults19.8%17.6–22.1
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Vision disability among adults10.1%9.2–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6431.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)31.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription80.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate66.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population17.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households40.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age31.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$60,543$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$116,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$927$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured