Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78839

in Crystal City, TexasPopulation 7,091

30.79/ 100

Ranked #30,587 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.7%)

Ranked #1,809 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 3.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

41.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

16.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

43.1%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.9%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

49.1%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

134.2 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

28%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.8%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Crystal City, Texas (ZIP 78839) lands in the bottom 4.7% nationally (30,587th) and the bottom 3.2% of Texas (1,809th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled uninsured registers in the top 0.2% nationally, and vision disability sits in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 0.2% nationally, and self-care disability is in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the top 0.5% nationally, colon screening settles in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and extreme heat lies in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 1.2% nationally, and independent living disability lands in the top 2.9% nationally. Better still, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 1.9% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 78872, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 1.0%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.02%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.6%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%25.1–28.5
High blood pressure among adults43.0%40.8–45.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.1%4.7–5.4
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.7–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Depression among adults20.6%18.9–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.8%23.0–26.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%38.6–42.9
Obesity among adults48.3%44.1–52.4
Stroke among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.9%16.4–24.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years41.7%36.8–46.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%76.2–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.7%71.5–75.9
Cholesterol screening among adults80.4%78.4–82.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years49.1%43.6–55.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults40.4%36.9–44.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.8%62.2–71.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.8%11.5–14.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.8–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults49.9%46.2–53.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%32.9–48.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults43.1%39.6–46.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%17.3–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults21.7%19.9–23.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.4%20.3–24.8
Any disability among adults48.3%45.0–51.8
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.8–11.6
Independent living disability among adults14.8%13.2–16.5
Mobility disability among adults28.0%25.6–30.5
Self-care disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Vision disability among adults16.5%14.8–18.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate33.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6419.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)28.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription86.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate68.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population6.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households35.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age31.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$37,365$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$103,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$519$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 1.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.77 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured