Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78412

in Corpus Christi, TexasPopulation 38,631

51.70/ 100

Ranked #13,828 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #435 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #7 of 36 Corpus Christi, TX ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

20.1%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.2%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.5%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

44.9%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

325 units

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

40.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 78412, one of several in Corpus Christi, Texas, overall, ranks in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,828th) and the top 23% of Texas (435th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 7.5% nationally, and transit is in the top 8.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled uninsured sits in the top 4.5% nationally, expected annual loss lands in the top 3.8% nationally, and tree cover lies at the national minimum. Modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 6.5% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 6.7% nationally. Homeownership registers in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and modeled binge drinking resides in the top 8.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden settles in the top 9.4% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". ZIP 78414, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Corpus Christi, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.5 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $61,215 predicts 78.1 years — 2.4 years above.

    Ranked #711 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.5 ± 1.4 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.2 years — 3.4 years above them.

    Ranked #624 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.4%17.5–21.8
High blood pressure among adults32.0%29.2–35.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.9
Depression among adults21.3%18.7–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.5–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.9%30.9–37.4
Obesity among adults37.0%32.4–42.4
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%9.9–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.1%17.9–22.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.1%70.7–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.4%70.1–77.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%81.1–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%54.8–63.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.8%51.5–58.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%66.6–79.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.8–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.9–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%24.1–31.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%33.0–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.7%20.5–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.6–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.6–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%14.1–17.6
Any disability among adults32.7%29.4–36.6
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.6–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.4%12.0–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6425.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)8.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription90.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate44.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population8.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households47.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+15.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age31.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$61,215$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$197,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,322$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured