Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78385

in Sarita, TexasPopulation 109

38.69/ 100

Ranked #27,599 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.0%)

Ranked #1,563 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

37.2%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

44.6%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.5%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

175.2 days/year

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.1%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

3.9%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

64.6%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.8%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

18.8%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sarita, Texas (ZIP 78385) ranks in the bottom 14.0% nationally (27,599th) and the bottom 16% of Texas (1,563rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled uninsured resides in the top 0.4% nationally, and colon screening stands in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health sits in the top 3.8% nationally, and humid heat resides in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 4.7% nationally, slow internet speeds sits in the top 3.1% nationally, and home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, households without a vehicle sits in the top 5.0% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 6.1% nationally.

Against its neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 78379, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.7%20.8–27.0
High blood pressure among adults35.9%31.8–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.7–7.9
Depression among adults19.5%16.4–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.0%14.7–19.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%34.3–43.6
Obesity among adults37.2%28.8–46.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.2%19.6–24.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years37.2%31.1–43.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%73.1–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.9%67.6–75.9
Cholesterol screening among adults82.8%80.2–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years44.6%40.5–48.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults32.0%29.7–34.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.8%60.8–72.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.1–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%11.6–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.4%34.2–46.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.7%36.3–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.5%28.8–38.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%14.9–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%15.5–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%16.6–22.2
Any disability among adults41.6%36.1–47.3
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.4–12.6
Mobility disability among adults21.3%18.0–24.5
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.2–7.1
Vision disability among adults10.1%8.7–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)44.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle18.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription64.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate60.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population29.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households50.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+52.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age65.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$39,342$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured