Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78152

in Saint Hedwig, TexasPopulation 4,521

53.92/ 100

Ranked #10,804 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #329 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #39 of 117 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

94 days/year

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

151.5 days/year

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$123,981

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

31.3%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Saint Hedwig, Texas (ZIP 78152), by its composite score, sits in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,804th) and the top 18% of Texas (329th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: household income sits in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled radon rests in the bottom 6.3% nationally, transportation noise resides in the bottom 16% nationally, and energy burden is in the bottom 16% nationally. Poverty lands in the bottom 18% nationally. On the other side, modeled extreme heat stands in the top 1.9% nationally, modeled humid heat registers in the top 4.3% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Floodplain exposure sits in the top 19% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 78121, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.1%24.3–29.8
High blood pressure among adults36.1%32.8–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.5–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.2–7.0
Depression among adults24.0%21.2–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.9–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.9–39.4
Obesity among adults31.3%27.2–35.6
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%8.0–11.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.5%10.8–14.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.6–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%72.0–78.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.2–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%62.0–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.5%59.7–65.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%68.9–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.4–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.2–14.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%21.4–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%34.9–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%15.8–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.2–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.7–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Any disability among adults29.1%26.0–32.6
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.6–15.3
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–649.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate83.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households50.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$123,981$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$325,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,824$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.45 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured