Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77951

in Bloomington, TexasPopulation 1,930

40.19/ 100

Ranked #26,626 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #1,439 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #11 of 12 Victoria, TX ZIPs (bottom 8.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

29.1%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

158.5 days/year

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.3%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

13.9%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

42.1%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

52.1 days/year

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

12.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Bloomington, Texas (ZIP 77951), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,626th) and the bottom 23% of Texas (1,439th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled uninsured sits in the top 1.3% nationally, industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 1.5% nationally, and humid heat lands in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening resides in the bottom 5.2% nationally, modeled transportation noise lies in the top 4.9% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and extreme heat is in the top 8.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests in the top 9.8% nationally. Better still, modeled radon sits in the bottom 0.5% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 77905, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Victoria, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.0%20.1–26.1
High blood pressure among adults35.6%31.5–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Depression among adults19.8%16.7–23.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.6%14.4–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.5–41.3
Obesity among adults39.5%31.2–48.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.9%15.1–20.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years29.1%24.5–34.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%73.1–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.9%68.7–76.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.4–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.3%50.2–60.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.3%39.9–46.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.7%59.5–75.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.0–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.5–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.0%30.6–41.9
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%34.5–47.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.6%24.8–32.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.1–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.0–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%14.9–19.5
Any disability among adults36.4%31.6–41.5
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.4
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.5–20.7
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.0
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6447.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)24.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)3.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle12.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription77.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate73.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population25.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households45.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+9.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age26.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$49,531$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$133,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$745$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.4 yr ± 3.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.24 years of 84.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured