Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77530

in Channelview, TexasPopulation 31,527

38.11/ 100

Ranked #27,945 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.9%)

Ranked #1,598 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 14.5%)

Ranked #198 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

33.5%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

48.2%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

64.3 per million

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.3%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

11.7%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.4%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

150.3 days/year

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Channelview, Texas (ZIP 77530) ranks in the bottom 12.9% nationally (27,945th) and the bottom 14.5% of Texas (1,598th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled uninsured lies in the top 0.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 0.10% nationally. Modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 0.3% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site sits at the national minimum, modeled mammography rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 6.3% nationally, humid heat settles in the top 4.7% nationally, and expected annual loss lies in the top 6.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 77015, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.5%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 0.5 (bottom 1%); chronic-disease standing 75.1 — 75 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,792 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.6%16.6–20.7
High blood pressure among adults32.0%29.1–34.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.2–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Depression among adults20.5%18.0–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.8–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%31.8–38.0
Obesity among adults40.8%36.1–45.5
Stroke among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.5%19.2–26.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years33.5%30.2–36.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.0%68.0–73.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.8%66.3–73.0
Cholesterol screening among adults79.2%77.0–81.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years48.2%44.1–52.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.5%39.5–45.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.3%58.4–71.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.7–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.3%13.3–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.4%29.6–37.2
Short sleep duration among adults42.1%38.5–45.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.4%25.5–31.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.5–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%18.0–22.2
Any disability among adults37.1%33.4–40.8
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.6
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.6–18.4
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Vision disability among adults9.4%8.7–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6442.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)29.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)8.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription89.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate69.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population33.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households37.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+10.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age32.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$62,195$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$180,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,160$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured