Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77518

in Bacliff, TexasPopulation 9,541

36.46/ 100

Ranked #28,781 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)

Ranked #1,677 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)

Ranked #209 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (bottom 11.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

24.6%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

73.8%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

52.3%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.5%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

148.7 days/year

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.9%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

28.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.5%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Bacliff, Texas (ZIP 77518) sits in the bottom 10.3% nationally (28,781st) and the bottom 10.3% of Texas (1,677th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled uninsured rests in the top 2.4% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 3.0% nationally, crowded housing resides in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled mammography lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 5.1% nationally, and vision disability stands in the top 7.9% nationally. Poverty is in the top 7.6% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 9.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 77539, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.1 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $51,458 predicts 77.5 years — 3.3 years below.

    Ranked #4,481 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.1 ± 1.4 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.8 years — 3.6 years below them.

    Ranked #2,812 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%22.0–27.9
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.6–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Depression among adults24.6%21.1–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.2–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%31.9–40.1
Obesity among adults39.7%32.2–47.8
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.8%17.0–24.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years24.6%21.9–27.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.4–76.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.7%67.5–75.5
Cholesterol screening among adults80.9%78.7–82.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years52.3%46.9–57.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.1%40.5–47.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.9%58.6–74.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.5–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%16.6–21.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%29.8–39.8
Short sleep duration among adults41.2%36.1–46.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.5%26.1–32.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%18.2–22.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%15.2–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.0%17.8–22.2
Any disability among adults38.2%33.5–42.7
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.5–21.1
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Vision disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6437.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)20.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate61.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population15.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households38.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+7.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age32.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$51,458$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$201,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,498$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.1 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 74.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured