Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77336

in Huffman, TexasPopulation 14,342

44.43/ 100

Ranked #22,992 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #1,040 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #150 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

157.1 days/year

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.6%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST23rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.5%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

49.4%

in the top 13.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Huffman, Texas (ZIP 77336) sits in the bottom 28% nationally (22,992nd) and the bottom 44% of Texas (1,040th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 1.6% nationally, humid heat registers in the top 3.0% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 6.8% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled mammography is in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Floodplain exposure lies in the top 11.0% nationally, and modeled extreme heat registers in the top 11.5% nationally. Modeled uninsured is in the top 10.3% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled radon lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 77345, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $96,404 predicts 79.9 years — 3.8 years below.

    Ranked #4,943 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.9 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.6%22.2–27.3
High blood pressure among adults35.0%32.0–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
Depression among adults24.5%21.6–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.3–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.9–41.6
Obesity among adults37.3%32.9–42.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.7–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.5%13.5–17.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.5%72.6–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.4%70.2–76.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.8–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.6%52.6–60.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.9%51.8–57.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.9%62.2–75.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.7–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%14.0–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%22.0–28.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%34.5–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%19.1–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.6–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%13.1–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.2–19.0
Any disability among adults33.3%30.1–37.1
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.6–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6418.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)9.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate78.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households53.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age34.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$96,404$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$276,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,612$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.9978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.99 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured