Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77099

in Houston, TexasPopulation 50,064

39.02/ 100

Ranked #27,380 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.7%)

Ranked #1,541 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #195 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

29.1%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

47.9%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

30.7%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.4%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

941 units

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

15.7%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

155 days/year

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.3%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

48%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 77099, one of several in Houston, Texas ranks in the bottom 14.7% nationally (27,380th) and the bottom 18% of Texas (1,541st).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled uninsured sits in the top 1.3% nationally, and colon screening is in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled vision disability resides in the top 4.1% nationally. Crowded housing registers in the top 2.0% nationally, modeled short sleep rests in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled humid heat stands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled mammography lies in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 3.9% nationally. More encouragingly, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 1.6% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 77072, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.9 ± 1.3 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.1 years — 2.3 years below them.

    Ranked #1,755 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.2%18.2–22.4
High blood pressure among adults36.7%33.8–39.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Depression among adults18.9%16.6–21.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.6%15.9–19.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%33.9–40.0
Obesity among adults40.3%36.0–44.8
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.7%19.5–26.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years29.1%26.6–31.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.5%71.8–77.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.8%69.8–75.8
Cholesterol screening among adults80.4%78.3–82.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years47.9%43.9–52.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults39.8%37.0–42.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.3%59.6–72.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.2–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%14.8–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.1%32.4–39.8
Short sleep duration among adults44.8%41.1–48.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.2%27.6–32.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.5–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%14.2–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.8–21.5
Any disability among adults37.9%34.5–41.3
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.3
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.4–12.6
Mobility disability among adults18.7%16.9–20.6
Self-care disability among adults6.6%6.1–7.1
Vision disability among adults10.4%9.7–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6445.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)27.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)10.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle8.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate37.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)15.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population45.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households38.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+12.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age33.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$49,396$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$198,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,265$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured