Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76841

in Fort Mc Kavett, TexasPopulation 262

42.99/ 100

Ranked #24,386 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #1,195 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

48.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.5%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.8%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

106.7 mi

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

33.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fort Mc Kavett, Texas (ZIP 76841), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 24% nationally (24,386th) and the bottom 36% of Texas (1,195th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 0.7% nationally, coronary heart disease settles in the top 2.8% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the top 4.1% nationally, modeled hearing disability settles in the top 3.8% nationally, and homeownership lands in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Better still, modeled transportation noise rests at the national minimum, and poverty settles at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription lands at the national maximum, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 3.3% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 76849, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.7%37.0–44.3
High blood pressure among adults49.2%45.0–53.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.1%12.8–15.5
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.6%9.7–15.7
Depression among adults22.2%19.3–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.8%16.1–21.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened48.4%44.5–52.4
Obesity among adults34.6%28.2–41.5
Stroke among adults6.0%5.0–7.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%11.9–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%10.4–19.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure86.2%84.1–88.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.6–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.4–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.5%71.1–75.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.9%48.8–52.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%70.1–78.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.2%9.6–13.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%10.3–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.6%26.4–38.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%31.4–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.1%21.7–32.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.7–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%15.1–21.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.0–17.5
Any disability among adults42.0%36.0–47.7
Hearing disability among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
Independent living disability among adults10.8%8.6–13.1
Mobility disability among adults24.8%20.1–29.4
Self-care disability among adults5.6%4.4–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.3%5.9–8.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6450.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)63.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate33.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households66.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+5.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age17.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$108,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.7 yr ± 1.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.89 years of 85.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured