ZIP code

76664

in Mart, TexasPopulation 3,231

ZipVitals Score

How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

39.96/ 100

Ranked #26,788 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #1,459 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #27 of 36 Waco, TX ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

Jump to a section

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

86.3 days/year

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th

US96th

Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.31 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th

US96th

Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th

US8th

Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Mart, Texas (ZIP 76664) lands in the bottom 16% nationally (26,788th) and the bottom 22% of Texas (1,459th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: elder services is in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled radon resides in the bottom 8.0% nationally, distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 15% nationally, and lead in tap water rests in the bottom 17% nationally. Set against that, modeled extreme heat stands in the top 3.9% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat lands in the top 10.4% nationally, mammography sits in the bottom 14.1% nationally, and short sleep is in the top 16% nationally.

A note on the terms: radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 76624, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Waco, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare withinUnited StatesTexasMetro area

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

close to the middle of the United States

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of the United States

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

Disability

healthier than 27%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.4%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

close to the middle of Texas

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of Texas

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

Disability

healthier than 33%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 2%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

less healthy than most of this metro area

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

Disability

healthier than 34%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.00%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Arthritis among adults	29.9%	26.7–32.8
High blood pressure among adults	40.8%	36.8–44.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults	8.4%	7.7–9.2
Current asthma among adults	11.1%	9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults	7.8%	7.1–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults	9.2%	8.1–10.2
Depression among adults	24.1%	20.8–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults	15.0%	13.2–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened	37.8%	33.8–41.6
Obesity among adults	37.2%	30.2–44.2
Stroke among adults	4.5%	4.1–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years	16.3%	13.8–19.3

PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years	14.6%	12.5–16.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure	79.1%	76.5–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults	76.5%	73.0–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults	85.8%	84.1–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years	62.3%	57.9–66.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults	50.0%	46.7–53.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years	70.0%	62.7–77.0

Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Binge drinking among adults	15.4%	12.9–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults	16.8%	14.6–19.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults	30.3%	26.1–34.5
Short sleep duration among adults	40.3%	34.8–46.4

Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults	24.8%	22.0–27.5
Frequent mental distress among adults	18.7%	16.7–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults	16.0%	14.3–17.8

DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults	16.7%	14.9–18.5
Any disability among adults	36.0%	31.9–40.0
Hearing disability among adults	8.1%	7.3–9.0
Independent living disability among adults	10.3%	9.3–11.4
Mobility disability among adults	18.6%	16.5–20.6
Self-care disability among adults	5.1%	4.6–5.6
Vision disability among adults	6.5%	5.9–7.1

Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate	10.8%	10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364	12.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–64	19.2%	9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286	22.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)	10.2%	7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505	12.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)	16.9%	23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505	21.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)	5.0%	3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274	4.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle	5.9%	3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322	3.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription	84.6%	89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322	89.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)	28.3%	23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322	26.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate	74.6%	78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322	75.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)	2.1%	1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322	3.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population	1.3%	2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553	8.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households	52.3%	53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087	48.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+	18.4%	19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553	16.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age	38.4 yr	42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292	38.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income	$74,618	$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318	$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value	$168,900	$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049	$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent	$941	$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670	$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508

Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth	75.0 yr ± 1.18	78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308	78.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

Statistically similar ZIPs nationally

Similar means a ZIP whose health profile is shaped like this one’s — the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the nine health domains behind the Score, not similar demographics or income. The percentage is how closely the two patterns line up. A very similar ZIP can still have a different overall Score.

75692Texas100% similar
Score 43.86View 75692 Compare this ZIP with 75692
76693Texas99% similar
Score 40.77View 76693 Compare this ZIP with 76693
76524Texas99% similar
Score 38.52View 76524 Compare this ZIP with 76524
75668Texas99% similar
Score 43.29View 75668 Compare this ZIP with 75668
75561Texas99% similar
Score 41.16View 75561 Compare this ZIP with 75561
74044Oklahoma99% similar
Score 42.74View 74044 Compare this ZIP with 74044
79252Texas98% similar
Score 42.44View 79252 Compare this ZIP with 79252
76567Texas98% similar
Score 40.80View 76567 Compare this ZIP with 76567
75143Texas98% similar
Score 42.50View 75143 Compare this ZIP with 75143
75474Texas98% similar
Score 43.27View 75474 Compare this ZIP with 75474

as of 2026

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured