Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75254

in Dallas, TexasPopulation 25,050

54.21/ 100

Ranked #10,436 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #311 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #93 of 265 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Homeownership rate

24.9%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.81 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

17.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

87.9 days/year

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.8%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.5%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

44.6%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.8%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.8%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 75254, one of several in Dallas, Texas, by its composite score, sits in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,436th) and the top 17% of Texas (311th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: outpatient resides in the top 3.0% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease is in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally. On the other side, homeownership stands in the bottom 2.5% nationally, modeled transportation noise registers in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled extreme heat settles in the top 3.6% nationally. PFAS in drinking water sits at the national maximum, housing-cost burden lies in the top 5.8% nationally, and modeled uninsured rests in the top 6.6% nationally. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 6.4% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 75001, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 21.3; chronic-disease standing 95.1 (top 10%) — 74 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,713 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults15.9%14.2–17.7
High blood pressure among adults28.0%25.3–30.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Depression among adults20.3%17.8–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.8%28.9–34.8
Obesity among adults34.1%30.1–38.4
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.5–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.8%16.0–19.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.1%65.1–71.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.5%70.5–76.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.4–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.8%54.8–62.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.3%53.5–59.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%68.1–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%16.3–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%9.7–12.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%22.8–28.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%31.5–38.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%16.7–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.7–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%13.1–16.2
Any disability among adults25.9%23.2–28.9
Hearing disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.4
Mobility disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6425.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle6.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)44.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate24.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population26.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households42.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age33.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$67,216$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$287,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,484$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured