Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75090

in Sherman, TexasPopulation 26,594

41.03/ 100

Ranked #26,008 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #1,371 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #16 of 17 Sherman-Denison, TX ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

20.2%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

75.5 days/year

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.6%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.96 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.1%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST25th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

20.4 mi

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 75090, one of several in Sherman, Texas ranks in the bottom 19% nationally (26,008th) and the bottom 27% of Texas (1,371st).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Physicians registers in the top 7.2% nationally, and dental providers rests in the top 7.4% nationally. Pharmacy stands in the top 8.2% nationally, and grocery lies in the top 10.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled uninsured lands in the top 4.4% nationally, extreme heat sits in the top 5.4% nationally, and short sleep is in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and distance to a community health center resides in the top 8.0% nationally.

To spell things out, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Close by, ZIP 75020, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sherman-Denison, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.6 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $55,543 predicts 77.8 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,302 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.6 ± 1.2 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.6 years — 3.0 years below them.

    Ranked #2,380 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.2%22.2–28.2
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.2–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.2–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.1–8.8
Depression among adults24.1%20.4–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.1–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.5–41.0
Obesity among adults36.4%28.3–44.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.3%14.1–20.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.2%17.9–22.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.9–77.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.6%69.4–77.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.5%80.5–84.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.1%51.5–62.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.7%45.9–53.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.9%62.2–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.2–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%14.0–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.5%27.7–37.3
Short sleep duration among adults42.6%35.5–49.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.6–28.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.2–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.7–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.2%16.2–20.2
Any disability among adults36.8%32.2–41.2
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.5–11.7
Mobility disability among adults17.1%15.1–19.1
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.6–5.4
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.5–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6427.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)16.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate57.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population13.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households45.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age33.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$55,543$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$188,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,347$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.6 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured