Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72821

in Wiederkehr Village, ArkansasPopulation 1,972

32.71/ 100

Ranked #30,115 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.1%)

Ranked #478 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 15.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

27.6%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

13.4%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.1%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

67.5%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.6%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

31.3%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

16.5%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Wiederkehr Village, Arkansas (ZIP 72821) ranks in the bottom 6.1% nationally (30,115th) and the bottom 15.0% of Arkansas (478th).

continue reading

Plainly stated, a few measures mark out this area: modeled tooth loss stands in the top 4.7% nationally, and crowded housing settles in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and mammography resides in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 5.0% nationally, modeled fair or poor health registers in the top 7.3% nationally, and modeled independent living disability sits in the top 7.1% nationally. Poverty rests in the top 6.1% nationally, and households without a vehicle is in the top 6.2% nationally. Better still, childcare stands in the top 6.9% nationally.

For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 72949, just across the boundary. The area additionally shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 69.4; chronic-disease standing 11.2 — 58 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,875 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%30.5–36.4
High blood pressure among adults45.0%41.4–48.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.4–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.2–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.3%11.1–13.6
Depression among adults27.6%24.3–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.7–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%37.6–45.0
Obesity among adults40.3%33.6–47.0
Stroke among adults5.1%4.7–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.6%23.7–31.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%10.9–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.8–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.8–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%80.7–84.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.8%55.2–64.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.7%41.3–47.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.1%58.7–72.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.7–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.4%18.8–24.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.9%33.3–42.5
Short sleep duration among adults41.4%35.7–47.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.6%27.6–33.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.9%18.9–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults19.5%17.6–21.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.0%19.8–24.2
Any disability among adults44.5%40.3–48.8
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.2–12.4
Independent living disability among adults12.9%11.6–14.2
Mobility disability among adults22.1%19.9–24.5
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Vision disability among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.2%23.9–30.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%19.2–24.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.2–17.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.6–17.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Loneliness among adults34.5%30.2–39.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)14.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle16.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription67.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate75.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)13.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households31.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+15.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age36.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$37,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$100,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$716$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.1 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 73.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured