Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72739

in Hiwasse, ArkansasPopulation 463

57.70/ 100

Ranked #6,641 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #12 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (top 2.2%)

Ranked #6 of 40 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR ZIPs (top 15.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.7%

in the bottom 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.9%

in the bottom 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

10.1%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.28%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Hiwasse, Arkansas (ZIP 72739) lands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,641st) and the top 2.2% of Arkansas (12th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: housing-cost burden sits at the national minimum, and poverty rests at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription is at the national maximum, and modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Lithium in drinking water settles in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 11.6% nationally. On the other hand, fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 9.8% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 72712, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.2%25.3–31.2
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.8–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.8–8.0
Depression among adults23.2%20.2–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.3–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%33.3–40.5
Obesity among adults35.1%30.4–39.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.0–13.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%6.0–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.5–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.7–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.6–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.3%59.0–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.7%63.5–69.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%65.7–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.9–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.1–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.5%20.8–28.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%28.5–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.1–21.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.3–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.6
Any disability among adults31.1%27.3–35.2
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.7–9.8
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.4
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.4–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%19.9–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.2–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.0–6.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.2–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Loneliness among adults28.7%24.8–32.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate83.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households44.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+27.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured