ZIP code
72440
in Lynn, ArkansasPopulation 269
38.86/ 100
Ranked #27,496 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.3%)
Ranked #296 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 47%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Arsenic in groundwater
0.86%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
20.5 mi
in the top 4.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
80.7 mi
in the top 5.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
14.9 mi
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
8.5%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
98.2%
in the top 6.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST85thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.8%
in the top 6.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS7thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.06%
in the bottom 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST16thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.0%
in the top 9.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST73rdUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Lynn, Arkansas (ZIP 72440) sits in the bottom 14.3% nationally (27,496th) and the bottom 47% of Arkansas (296th).
The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 0.6% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 4.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled pfas lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally, fiber broadband settles in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Working the other way, distance to a nursing home sits in the top 5.5% nationally, and slow internet speeds registers in the top 6.4% nationally.
In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 72466, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 14%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 28%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 31%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 19%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 16%
8%
Disability
healthier than 13%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 14%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 9%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.3%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 64%
13%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 47%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 48%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 41%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 30%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 35%
8%
Disability
healthier than 36%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.9%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
72466
Arkansasshares a border
Score 40.26
Closest healthier
72434
Arkansasabout 7.0 mi away
Score 39.94
Similar health profile
71950
Arkansas99% similar profile
Score 41.98
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.4% | 30.6–38.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 45.4% | 40.7–50.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.6% | 9.4–11.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.6% | 9.2–12.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.8% | 8.5–11.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.5% | 9.7–13.6 |
| Depression among adults | 26.5% | 22.6–30.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.5% | 12.4–16.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.1% | 37.3–46.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 42.8% | 34.4–51.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.9% | 4.2–5.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.1% | 14.8–21.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.9% | 8.1–13.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.4% | 76.4–82.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.9% | 76.1–83.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.2% | 82.7–87.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.4% | 61.3–70.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 45.4% | 41.2–49.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 72.9% | 64.2–80.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.8% | 11.2–16.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.9% | 15.5–22.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 35.8% | 29.8–42.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.9% | 30.8–44.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 27.1% | 22.9–31.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.0% | 16.7–21.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.0% | 15.6–20.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.3% | 16.6–22.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.5% | 36.9–48.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.0% | 9.7–12.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.4% | 9.7–13.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 21.2% | 18.0–24.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.4–6.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.7% | 5.8–7.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.5% | 21.5–29.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.1% | 13.8–21.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 8.9–14.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 10.2–14.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.8% | 7.4–10.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.5% | 28.1–39.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.2% | 7.8–10.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AR median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 4.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 9.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 11.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 9.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 10.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 15.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574 |
| Broadband subscription | 76.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 83.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574 |
| Homeownership rate | 78.7% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578 |
| Single-parent households | 64.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571 |
| Population 65+ | 22.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578 |
| Median age | 48.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573 |
| Median household income | $48,056 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505 |
| Median home value | $95,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519 |
| Median gross rent | $691 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $800 ($568–$1,094) n=393 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AR median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 82.2 yr ± 2.20 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.20 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured