Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71263

in Oak Grove, LouisianaPopulation 6,410

38.96/ 100

Ranked #27,423 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.5%)

Ranked #253 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

71.3%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

130.5 days/year

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

10 mi

in the top 14.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$44,260

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST25th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

72.5%

in the top 29% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US71st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oak Grove, Louisiana (ZIP 71263), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 14.5% nationally (27,423rd) and the top 50% of Louisiana (253rd).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers lands in the top 7.2% nationally, pharmacy rests in the top 7.4% nationally, and modeled radon settles in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other hand, home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 6.9% nationally, and modeled humid heat settles in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lands in the top 10.2% nationally, and extreme heat rests in the top 11.2% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 10.8% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 71229, about 14 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.2 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $44,260 predicts 76.9 years — 2.6 years below.

    Ranked #3,625 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 94.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 13.4 — 81 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #439 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.0%31.1–38.8
High blood pressure among adults45.6%40.9–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.4–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%9.8–12.6
Depression among adults27.9%23.9–32.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%14.0–18.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%37.2–46.8
Obesity among adults39.5%31.2–48.8
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.1%19.3–27.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.5–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.5–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.9%78.8–85.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%84.9–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%59.5–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.2%49.3–57.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%65.9–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.6–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.8%17.0–22.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.1%27.9–38.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%30.2–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.9%23.4–30.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.1–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.5–19.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.2–21.6
Any disability among adults41.9%36.8–46.8
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.0–12.7
Mobility disability among adults20.9%18.3–23.5
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%23.1–31.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.2%17.2–23.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.6–19.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.9–16.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
Loneliness among adults35.0%29.6–40.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.7–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–647.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)17.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription71.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate79.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households48.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$44,260$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$95,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$708$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.2 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured